College Alma Mater

The following was posted by Michael Aulick, the current theatre director at West Liberty University…my alma mater.

It is with great regret that I need to inform you all that the WLU Theatre production of MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING has been cancelled.  I met with the CIRT (Critical Incident response Team) today due to a circumstance in the program and learned that some of our procedures are not up to completely consistent with what the university recommends for safety protocols.  We believed that moving the show outdoors would allow us to be able to perform the show as we had conceived it (meaning characters would at times be closer than 6 feet apart).  I believed that we could be closer than 6 feet as long as it was not for more than 15 minutes (but that means for a 24 hour period). Shelby Garrett and Cassandra Noel Hackbart have thoughtfully blocked the show with no one that close for more than a minute or two at a time but we feel that with the dressing rooms, backstage, the show, etc. we cannot in good faith move forward once we realized the rule.

We are heartbroken for the cast and crew AND the families of the cast and crew who were looking forward to seeing their family member back on stage doing what they love.

I just got off a zoom call with the cast and we have started brainstorming ways we can find  the best conclusion to this 15 month project.  I think we will find a way to do some, if not all, for a facebook live event, but I am hoping we can do even more than that.

Please send thought, prayers, vibes, or whatever you believe you can send to the hilltop, there were a lot of sad faces on the call.

————————————————————————————————————-

I have nothing but positive recollections of my four years at West Liberty. I felt a responsibility to reply to this post. Here’s my comment.

Of course, I’m totally sympathetic and supportive of the Hilltop Players.  This setback is certainly a disappointment.  As the pandemic has taken a terrible toll in every aspect of our lives, I feel especially disheartened at the educational compromises experienced by students at every level.  Bravo to the teachers and staff members at WL for their resilient and heroic fortitude.  I was fortunate to have studied at West Liberty in the late ‘60’s under the tutelage of Dr. Kelly, Mr. Alexander and Mr. Harrison.  I can state with confidence that their collective wisdom, along with the collaborative outcomes of my cohorts, are highly influential factors in whatever professional success I may have enjoyed.  Perhaps, the most essential element of the takeaway is the significance of “process.”  As I recall those times, I remember most vividly the classroom, rehearsal and crew experiences.  The learning was powerful and still remains.  Certainly, the excitement of the culminating performances is a rich pinnacle of the journey.  But the process….that’s the thing. I’m sure whatever performance life “Much Ado About Nothing” finally assumes, it will be well received and satisfying. But the learning achieved in those fifteen months of good work, will be lifelong. Best to all.

Bigger Than The Sky–love–hate–love

Bigger Than The Sky is a film I’ve watched and rewatched many times.  The first time I saw it, I liked it very much.  However, at each subsequent viewing I became more aware of its weaknesses, of which there are many. Now I can say unequivocally, it is a flawed movie….flawed to the point that certain lines and scenes are embarrasingly uncomfortable.  Yet…in spite…. I still really like Bigger Than The Sky.  

The film was written by Rodney Patrick Vaccaro and directed by Al Corley. It was filmed in Portland, Oregon, which is also the setting for the narrative.  The cast includes some very talented folks including; John Corbett, who I loved in Northern Exposure; Amy Smart, a familiar tv and film artist; and most notably, the great Patty Duke, who skillfully, hysterically and ironically portrays identical twin-sisters in the film.

Anna Marie Patty Duke in Bigger Than The Sky

Bigger Than The Sky was released in 2005.  The critical response was not kind. The Rotten Tomatometer score was 12%.  I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a score that low. I take some satisfaction in the fact that the audience score was a more respectable 53%…still nothing to write home about.  Many of the reviews I’ve perused are mean, mean spirited….a ploy I’ve never found helpful. I certainly understand some of the negativity, but I contend there is much to embrace in Bigger Than The Sky.

It is a essentially a theatre story.  That in itself might limit its appeal. I believe in today’s culture, theatre may be regarded by some as an elitist passion, enticing primarily to privllidge.  But this theatre story carries additional baggage. It is about community theatre, non-professionals… garnering not only the general disdain, but also the additional disfavor of other self-aggrandized theatre genres.

I suppose that’s why Bigger Than The Sky appeals so strongly to me.  I’m part of the niche population so identifiable in the film. 

Marcus Thomas as Peter Rooker “Dear John.”

As the movie opens we meet an emotionally scarred Peter Rooker.  He has been dumped by his girlfirend and has called his sister for condolance.  He confides his sad reality….he has a dull job…a dull car…..no friends.  He’s dull.  

On his way to work the next day, he seems to be somehow “called”, as he walks past the Portland Community Theatre.  At work, his boss (the wonderful Greg Germann) entices him with a promotion because…. “there’s no I in Peter Rooker” 

“There’s no I in Peter Rooker”

Later, as he’s browsing in a bookstore, a customer walks right into him. “Sorry I didn’t see you”  “What do you mean, I’m standing right here!”  “I didn’t see you.”

Convinced he needs a change in his life, Rooker attends the theatre’s audition for Cyrano de Bergerac.

His hope is to meet some new people and move his life in a new direction. He’s read the play and identifies with the main character’s inability to express his love. 

John Corbett as Michael and Marcus Thomas as Peter

His audition is terrible and he self-consciously leaves the audition room only to become lost in the theatre’s black box. Here he encounters Grace Hargrove.  He strikes up a friendship with her, perhaps a hope of something more. Grace enlightens him with the theatre adage, “There are no small parts, only small actors.”

Amy Smart as Grace Hargrove

To everyone’s surprise, the Cyrano director, Edwina Walters, casts Peter in the lead role.  She believes that Peter sees the truth in the character and that truth will suffice.  So here we have the first flaw of the film.  Even though magicial illusions draw us into the story (floating feathers and blinking marquees), the director’s casting of a beginner in a role like Cyrano, breaks any premise of believability.  Of course, we want him to succeed.  We’re pulling for him. Edwina, Grace, and Michael (the John Corbett character) do everything they can to help him.  But the film branches out into a series of misguided misadventures that wander well beyond the illusion of reality. Along the way we hear expressions like “Welcome to tech-week,” “He’s going up!” “Good show!” “Blank canvas” etc. etc. etc. Of course, these expressions we know and live-by, but somehow sound terribly corny and/or pretentious here.  In the end, Peter is replaced (as we knew he would be) by an obnoxious self-indulgent ass.  So…a somewhat return to reality.  

And if that weren’t bad enough, a romance triangle emerges between Peter, Grace and Michael.  And again,  Peter becomes a loser in love. 

But his new experience has taught him a valuable lesson. Kippy Newberg, an ailing mentor to many at the Portland Community Theatre, provides Peter with clarity to the hackneyed montra uttered earlier by Grace.  “There are no small parts, only small dreams. And the theatre is no place for small dreams.” (The actor is good, the line is truthful, yet it somehow sounds fatuous. A flaw.)

Kippy’s inspiration

Peter is inspired by his chat with Kippy, and his story ends on a satisfying (if unrealistic) high note.

The film itself concludes as an inspired tribute/love letter to anyone who has ever identified with this world.

In spite of its many shortcomings, I hold this film as a favorite, not for what it turned out to be, but for what it tried to be.

Mother Instincts

Mother of The Year 2.18

Above: The wonderful cast of The Mother of the Year Murders at the Belvidere Manor February 10, 2018

Below…a brief excerpt from my upcoming book…Murder Show

In the earliest evolution of my murder mystery journey, I found I was developing scenarios around various holidays.  The Christmas Carol Murders, The Irish Eyes Murders and the Schoolhouse Masquerade Murders were titles developed around Christmas, St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween, respectively. I don’t think it was particularly my intention to pair scripts to holidays in this way.  But the performance venue believed it was in the overall best interest of the project that this be the case. I also found this a valid point when I began licensing my scripts for performances through my website.  Clearly, the Christmas and St. Patrick’s shows were the most popular requests.

So, when the folks at The Riverton Hotel and Restaurant expressed an interest in doing a show revolving around Mother’s Day, I came up with the notion of  The Mother of the Year Murders.  My thought was to center the action around a kind of a pageant that would crown the mother-of-the-year. I decided to go way over the top with wacky characters , who would be somewhat familiar to the audience members. June Cleavage and her son Otter were based on the classic ‘60’s tv show, Leave It To Beaver.  Livia Contralto and her son Teeny reminded us of The Sopranos.  And of course Hilary, Willy and Chesty Smintton, were pulled from the early aught headlines of the time.

About that, I must admit to the fact that I voted for Bill Clinton….twice.  I believe he was a good President. And perhaps history will judge him to be a great President.  But…and it’s a huge but…his personal antics while in the White House became the mother-lode of literary parody, satire and caricature for a decade.  Although Clinton’s behavior was, I’m sure, devastating to his wife and daughter, it was comedy gold and totally complimentary to my Mother of the Year Murders concept.  I recently produced Mother for the first time in quite a long while. The difference in audience reaction from earlier productions was amazing.  Back in the day, the Hilary character yielded its share of laughs, but at the same time benefited from a good deal of audience sympathy.  But in 2018, as our national polarization was rising to new heights, the character was treated with much disdain. I was surprised. It’s only a play people!  I felt badly for the actress playing the role. But she was a trooper and played it perfectly. Good job, Colleen.

 

 

Down The Nose

MM Scripts imageFolks who know me at all, understand the theatre to be a part of my life. Certainly never as means of sustenance but rather for essential internal gratification…like breathing. I won’t use the term “amateur” as it tends to suggest a negative context.  “Ardent” or “Passionate”  might better describe the caliber of engagement. It began when I was a teenager in a summer recreation program: You Can’t Take It With You and The Desperate Hours (circa 1965). I found that experience to be not only creatively stimulating, but also a benefit to my social state of being.  I didn’t have a lot of confidence as a kid. I wasn’t a particularly good student and I certainly wasn’t an athlete. I was always a bit overweight and never on the popular list. But my parents were greatly encouraging and held a non-negotiable  expectation that I would go to college. Thank God! …For left to my own devices I would most surely have passed-up the opportunity.  Prior to discovering the theatre, I was a “band” kid.  I played the saxophone in concert and marching band. But, alas, although I emerged as a leader in that sub-group…in retrospect, I really wasn’t very good at that either. As I’ve grown older, I’ve concluded that my slower reading rate probably held me back in this endeavor as in most academic skills. My suspicion, after all these years, is that I was probably afflicted with some kind of visual impairment such as  dyslexia, but educators didn’t know much about such things in those days. But the theatre, it seemed, didn’t actuate so much on a fluent reading rate. At least, here, I was able to beat the system. 

I think what I discovered as I evolved through my early life was the variety and diversity of experiences that were available to participants in the theatre.  I was, of course, first drawn to the typical comedies and musicals.  Often old-timely Broadway chestnuts, downsized to teenagers with gray-sprayed hair and penciled age lines on their foreheads. What fun!  I thoroughly enjoyed these experiences and envisioned myself as a future Stanley Kowalski or Sky Masterson. As a college student, I grew an appreciation for the classics…Molière, Chekov, Shakespeare. I found these works to be wonderful as they provided me with new levels of realization. 

In the creation of community theatre, there was a return to those perennial “chestnuts,” along with more contemporary plays and musicals as they became available. These offerings were attractive to participants and audience alike. At the same time, knowledge and experience in the classics enhanced execution.

In fact, it seemed to me that all dramatic genres are clearly structured and dependent upon the same literary conventions…protagonist, antagonist, conflict, theme, setting. ..etc. Over hundreds of years of playmaking…there’s not a lot of new material to be found along any of those lines.  What is different is the style and vision of the work.   

It’s all wonderful and deeply appreciated by most theatre people. 

But….then….someone invented a genre we know today as murder mysteries.  My community theatre began producing murder mystery shows on our main stage, primarily in an effort to offer something new for our actors and audience. Later we transitioned to dinner theatre experiences and eventually became dependent on them for essential fundraising opportunities. We found these experiences to be enjoyable as performers.The audiences, as well, seemed to be pleased by the change of pace. Of course, whereas  the “chestnuts” were written by the likes of Neil Simon and Moss Hart, the murder mysteries are authored by essentially unknown entities. They also feature broad situations, exaggerated characters and, sometimes, bawdy, adult humor.  For these reasons, I believe, some theatre people tend to disparage the work as unworthy of attention. In fact…perhaps regarding it as somehow diminishing to the integrity of the theatre as a whole. 

Obviously, I disagree with that notion. I believe the murder mystery characters find their genesis in Commedia dell’arte …. an Italian style of stage comedy that was popular in the 16th through 18th centuries.  It featured both scripted material and improvisational elements.

According to Wikipedia:

“The characters of the commedia usually represent fixed social types and stock characters, such as foolish old men, devious servants, or military officers full of false bravado. The characters are exaggerated ‘real characters’. ”

Sound familiar?  This format has been passed down through the generations of theatre styles: melodrama, farce, sketch comedy, situation comedy and more. But it finds, I believe, particular familiarity in the land of the dinner theatre murder mystery: stock characters, exaggerated situations, good guys and bad guys…all of it….right out of the  Commedia. In addition, I find a particular challenge to actors in these shows. They are required to be true to the author’s scripted intentions but, at the same time, required to significantly contribute to the text via improvisational interactions with other characters, as well as, with the audience.

 Clearly, everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but my sense is that most criticism of this genre comes from artists who are inexperienced in its challenge and execution.  Would I prefer to play Willy Loman?  Sure…sometimes.  But there is significant satisfaction to be gained, I believe, in the explorations of a good old fashion murder mystery. 

Another Fourth of July

imageDuring my childhood, the Fourth of July was probably the most anticipated day of the year…other than Christmas, of course. My home town of Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, hosted a big parade…at least to me it was a big parade. When I was very young, we would have to go to the main street of town to watch it. But later…maybe when I was eight or nine, the parade organizers expanded the route so that it traveled right past our house. People would come from all over to witness the parade which featured fire and ambulance vehicles of the many volunteer service organizations in the area. They all would proudly blast their sirens. It could get quite loud. The event itself was sponsored by our local fire department in Monmouth Junction. But lots of other local organizations participated…boy scouts and girl scouts, little league, 4-H ….many more. As a teenager, I marched in the parade many times with various organizations…including the Emerald Knights Drum and Bugle Corps, pictured above. Because of our vantage point, lots of people stationed themselves on our front lawn to view the parade. These folks were mostly longtime friends and relatives, many of whom we only saw on the Fourth of July.  I would help my parents carry our lawn chairs from the backyard to the front. I also remember toting our redwood picnic table benches to the front yard.  Many who came brought their own chairs, and some brought blankets on which to sit. In retrospect, the units marching in the parade were not all that exciting, but they were folks from our town…and we were proud. My sister and I always enjoyed these days as did, I believe, my parents.  It was a time for community and family.  It was also patriotic. We would all stand when an American flag marched by.  It wasn’t a big deal. I don’t think it conveyed any secondary agendas. It was fine.  After the parade we would go next door to my grandparents’ house for lunch. Sometimes we would host a cookout lunch ourselves. I remember wonderful food, lovingly prepared.  Later, we would all go to the nearby municipal park, where the celebration continued until dusk.  As a young family man, I returned to my hometown for the parade each year, with my wife and kids. Once my daughter had her picture taken with my sister and the photo appeared in the local newspaper…wonderful.  I just searched our scrapbooks for that picture…of course I couldn’t find it. I know it’s around somewhere. Maybe I’ll post it next Fourth of July.

As the ’70’s wound down, so did the parade.  I’m not sure why it all ended….probably the expense.  Just a tucked away memory now…but such a sweet one.  Happy Fourth!

Baseball of the Heart

June 2, 2019

I was very much moved by the tribute this weekend to the 1969 World Series Champion New York Mets.  I was young in ’69…in the middle of a wonderful college experience…and newly in love with “the one.”  As announcer Howie Rose introduced the likes of Ron Swaboda, Jerry Grote and Ed Kranepool, I was happily transported to a golden time in my life.  Although I still watch baseball, the Mets reunion reminded me that so many baseball “moments” reflect personal milestones in my younger and better times.  

I was so moved as to revisit a favorite poetry book of mine, Home Team, by Edwin Romond. As I sat on my porch in the early evening, the imagery of the poems sparked so many emotions:  childhood pain in “The Mazarosky Wall,” thrills of the barreling Thurmon in “The Distant Man” and the lonely excitement of late night radio in “Baseball in the Dark.”  So many more.  

What’s remarkable is Edwin’s skill in painting such vivid pictures, at once reducing them to his personal reflections and then somehow transferring those inner-distinctions to the reader. Experiencing these poems in truly transformative.  Baseball as a metaphor of life? In this work…absolutely!

Yesterday…yesterday

June 29, 2019

I had the privilege of seeing the film, Yesterday, yesterday. What a treat!.  I don’t “go to the movies” much anymore, and that’s kind of sad.  Throughout my life I’ve enjoyed sitting in the dark theatre and feasting on the big screen…as well as the yummy popcorn.  As a little boy, I would go with my family…especially my mom.  Dad never liked going out much, so Mom would recruit me.  Special memories. Later, when my sister came along, she would join us.  As a teen and young adult, I would travel in friend- packs to see the latest films.  Fun times. Dating?  Sure…where else but the movies.  And as a young married and later a family man myself…the trips to the local cinemas were wonderful.  

These days, it’s hard for me to rationalize the trip.  I have big screen tv that brings hundreds of titles directly to me on a regular basis.  Mostly, though, I stay home because it’s kind of depressing to go to the movies by myself.  No pity please…that my doing….nobody else’s.  

But I had seen Kate McKinnon on Late Night With Seth Meyers.  She’s featured in Yesterday, and her description was appealing to me.  So I went and I’m glad I did.  I won’t give much away, but the premise is brilliant and frightening. The film imagines a world in which The Beatles had never existed.  Is that incredible? Think about it!  Of course in spite of that proposition, Yesterday is chock full of fantastic Beatles music.  On several occasions I felt my eyes misting up. What a baby! But the waterworks were even more imminent when the movie’s huge Easter Egg dropped near the end. 

A world without the Beatles!  Thank goodness it’s only a movie.  I highly recommend this film…even if you have to get up off your duff (one of Mom’s favorite expressions) and see it a theatre.  Lots to embrace.  

Parent’s Anniversary

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

May 5, 2017

My parents were married on this day in 1946.  It would have been their 71st wedding anniversary.  I have fond memories of growing up in ’50’s and ’60’s.  I guess we were a typical family of that era.  My father and mother didn’t often show affection, but I think, in their own way,  they were happy.  My father worked as a heavy equipment operator.  Because his work was seasonal, he couldn’t take off in the summer.  So sometimes my mother would take my sister and me to the shore on her own.  Dad would join us on the weekends.  We would often take Labor Day weekend trips…because that was his only time off.  My mother was a cafeteria worker in my high school and later became a school secretary.    I think I disappointed my parents because I wasn’t very good at sports or school.  Actually, I was probably better than I showed, in that I was very self-conscious and would always freeze up.  As I grew older, I became much better at school…but never any better at sports.  In any case, my parent were supportive of me and my sister, whatever we did.  I miss them all now and wish I had been more attentive to them when they were here.  Sadly, I suspect most people feel that way.  This photo, taken by my sister, shows my parents sitting in their front yard.  I think that’s where they were happiest.  In my heart today and always….Mom and Dad.

Time In A Bottle

 

Remembering warmly my maternal grandparents today.  They were married on this date in 1921. 96 years ago.  They had three beautiful daughters, each of whom had wonderful families of their own.  All three of their daughters have passed on.  Their descendants continue to live productive and remarkable lives.  My mother, Katherine, is on the far left in 1st photo and on the far right in the second photo.  My guess is she is about nine years old here, which would date these pictures around around 1932.  My grandparents are not together in these photos because they probably were taking the pictures of each other with their children.  It’s interesting to speculate on the non-smiling faces displayed. I’ve noticed this seriousness on other photos of the era.  I guess it wasn’t considered proper to smile.  A far cry from the contemporary approach to family photos.

Education Bullies : Then and Now

Have you been following politics lately?  Pretty hard to avoid it.  Strong opinions…loud and sometimes intolerant, seem to get a lot of attention.   At the forefront is what might be be described as national “bullying.”   I would suggest that a clear parallel is recalled in the classic American courtroom drama, Inherit The Wind.

I’ve admired this play for many years, and am now privileged to be involved in a new production at the Country Gate Playhouse in Belvidere, New Jersey.  Though the work, by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee, takes it’s origins from the Scopes “Monkey Trial” of 1925, its authors insist it is “not history.”  Certainly, the issues of creationism vs. evolution often take center stage, but the play is largely an argument about thought.  Moreover, the individual’s right to think…freely.  And the mission of educators to promote, motivate and inspire creative thinking in their students.

It is alarming that in all the discordant political fervor, education seems conspicuously absent from the agenda.   It’s true, the Founding Fathers delegated education as a function of the states, but that fact hasn’t stopped or reduced the influence of ruinous federal initiatives like No Child Left Behind.  And, generally, the states have only exacerbated the situation.  Many school districts have been forced to denigrate staff and curriculum in order to redirect resources toward the contemptible task of  “teaching the test.”  Has it been helpful?  Has it been worth it?  The answers we receive are mostly garbled and dysfunctional.

I was a New Jersey educator from 1970 through 2007.  Over that period many strategies for effective instruction appeared.  Some endured, most came and went.  But in my experience, the most meaningful student engagement, regardless of technique, resulted in a sense of self-discovery…the student’s ability to bring critical thought to a problem, concept or new idea.   In the ’90’s, a Best Practice citation was awarded to my district by the New Jersey Department of Education for innovation in interdisciplinary teaching and learning.  I recall it to have been a powerful experience for both teachers and students.  I worry that some of the many talented and creative teachers in today’s schools may become discouraged from pursuing such innovation in the current climate.

As the right to think is challenged in Inherit The Wind, I fear the governmental obsession for arbitrary success in one-dimensional standardized testing, has paradoxically diminished the ultimate power of the 21st century classroom.

This pivotal exchange by the two lawyers in Inherit The Wind, crystallizes the issue:

Brady:  He wants to destroy everybody’s belief in the Bible and in God.

Drummond:  You know that’s not true. I’m trying to stop you bigots and ignoramuses from            controlling the  education in the United States.

A cautionary tale?  Yes, I’m afraid it may be so.  As the political campaign intensifies, it would seem crucial that the candidates stop the bullying and, instead, launch a thoughtful, visionary dialogue about  quality education.  I think it’s an important issue.  How about you?

WARNING! SHAMELESS PLUG BELOW:

In the meantime, be sure to exercise your own thought process by seeing Inherit The Wind at the Country Gate Playhouse.